MYTH VS. FACT

MYTH: Progressive Prosecutors are Soft on Crime.

FACT: Opponents of criminal justice reform are advancing the unfounded claim that progressive prosecutors are responsible for increased crime. But the evidence simply does not back up these accusations (Center for American Progress, 2022). A progressive approach means prioritizing cases that pose a genuine threat to public safety rather than low-level offenses (Association of Prosecuting Attorneys, 2023).

MYTH: Progressive Prosecutors Don’t Hold People Accountable

FACT: Progressive prosecutors emphasize accountability, but through different means. Instead of advocating for incarceration in every case (which does not effectively prevent crime or recidivism), they may advocate for alternatives that address the root causes of criminal behavior. Some examples of alternatives include: mediation and conflict-resolution programs, victim-impact panels, victim–offender mediation, circle sentencing, and community reparative boards.

Research consistently shows that higher incarceration rates are not associated with lower violent crime rates (Stemen, 2007). Incarceration may even increase crime in certain circumstances. Researchers propose that high rates of imprisonment at the community level break down the social and family bonds that guide individuals away from crime, deprive communities of income, reduce future income potential, and remove adults who would otherwise nurture children (Clear, 2008).

At the individual level, there is also some evidence that incarceration actually increases a person’s risk of engaging in crime in the future (Vieraitis, Kovandzic, & Marvell, 2007). This may be because of the collateral consequences of even short periods of incarceration, such as loss of employment, loss of stable housing, or disruption of family ties (Visher, Yahner, & La Vigne, 2010) .

MYTH: Progressive Prosecutors Ignore Victims

FACT: Progressive prosecutors often seek to center victims’ needs and perspectives in the justice process. This can include advocating for restorative justice approaches, which involve victims in the process of holding offenders accountable and addressing harm in ways that traditional prosecutions may not (Vera Institute of Justice, 2020).

The facts

The “tough-on-crime” approach has failed to deliver on its promises of safety and justice. Instead, it has perpetuated cycles of harm and inequality (Urban Institute, 1997). By embracing progressive prosecution and investing in community-based solutions, we can address the root causes of crime and build a safer and more equitable society (Safety and Justice Challenge, 2021).

Contact us